Tag: invest

Posted on

Governor wants to invest $1 billion in mental health

Governor wants to invest billion in mental health

By Taylor Knopf

In his State of the State address Monday, Gov. Roy Cooper said the “youth mental health crisis cannot be ignored,” adding that he would soon “propose a plan that makes historic investments in the whole-person health.” 

On Wednesday, Cooper announced his plan to invest $1 billion in mental health and substance use services in North Carolina. The money will come from the $1.8 billion sign-on bonus the Biden administration has extended to get holdout states such as North Carolina to expand Medicaid coverage. 

“The highest priority for that bonus must be making smart investments in our mental health and substance use system across the entire continuum of care,” the governor’s plan reads.

In the wake of the pandemic, North Carolina is contending with a growing mental health and substance use crisis.

More and more people are waiting longer at emergency departments to go to a psychiatric hospital. Drug overdose deaths increased by 72 percent over the pandemic. Crippling workforce shortages in health care mean that psychiatric beds sit empty as the state struggles to fill vacant positions. People with disabilities have lost their direct service providers to higher-paying jobs. And teenagers are reporting high levels of depression and suicidal thoughts. 

“Clinics closing, people can’t find care […], folks waiting in emergency departments, staff levels at record lows… Folks, it is only going to get worse,” NC Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kody Kinsley said in February at the annual Legislative Breakfast on Mental Health, where he gave an update on the state of North Carolina’s mental health needs. “And I do not want to stand here next year and tell you how much worse it is. I want to sit here in front of you and say, ‘Here’s all the extra things we’re able to do because of Medicaid expansion.’” 

Kinsley has repeatedly said Medicaid expansion is the best investment for the state’s mental health system, as more people with behavioral health needs will be able to afford care. 

“There is not a better investment than Medicaid expansion,” NCDHHS Sec. Kody Kinsley said in February, slamming his hand down on the podium. “And I am tired of it not being done!” Photo credit: Taylor Knopf

“But after decades of no one being able to pay, we need to jumpstart our system of care,” Kinsley said Wednesday. “This plan does just that. It helps us invest wisely to make a system of care that prevents crises, serves people where and when they need it most, and helps increase health and decrease costs over people’s lifespans.”

“Not only is the system not working, it’s inefficient,” Kinsley added. “This plan allows us to save costs over time, by building better places and ways for folks to get preventative care and recovery supports.” 

Support from state lawmakers

After nearly a decade of debate, leaders of the North Carolina House and Senate announced in early March that they have reached an agreement on Medicaid expansion. 

Cooper’s plan to invest part of the sign-on bonus will require legislative action from the Republican-led General Assembly. Members of both chambers have suggested that there is support from their colleagues to spend $1 billion on mental health services. 

“I don’t think there’s anybody in our caucus that doesn’t have someone they know, or someone in their family, that has experienced a mental health or drug issue,” said Sen. Jim Burgin (R-Angier), who has emerged as a leader on behavioral health issues for Senate Republicans. 

On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Sen. Phil Berger, the Republican from Eden who leads the state Senate, said, “The governor has not informed Senate leadership of his preferred spending plan for the sign-on bonus, but there is certainly some shared concern for mental health and substance abuse issues.”

Sen. Jim Burgin (R-Angier) gestures to NC Department of Health and Human Services Sec. Kody Kinsley during a mental health townhall in Greensboro in July 2022. Both men have talked about the friendship and working relationship they’ve developed, particularly on the topic of mental health. Photo credit: Taylor Knopf

In the House, Rep. Wayne Sasser (R-Albemarle) told the audience gathered at the breakfast event in February that he feels “motivated” to have more than a billion dollars to spend on whatever the state would like as part of the expansion deal.

“And we want to spend a billion of that on mental health,” Sasser added.

How to spend the $1 billion

The governor’s proposal for spending the $1 billion is broken down into three parts: to make behavioral health services more available when people need them, to build a stronger system for people in crisis and those with complex needs, and to better track data to ensure access and health outcomes.

  • Medicaid rate increases — $225 million

First on the list, with the largest price tag of $225 million over three years, is ​​raising Medicaid rates for behavioral health services. Providers of mental health services have said for years that they need higher reimbursement rates to be able to continue working. Even private insurance plans often pay as little as 80 percent of what Medicare — a government program — pays to mental health providers. 

The governor’s plan would cover three years of rate increases, noting that “ongoing funding would be needed to sustain rate increases beyond that.”

  • Improve access in schools/communities — $175 million

“Youth suicides doubled in the last decade,” the governor’s report reads. “Suicide is the second leading cause of death for youth in North Carolina ages 10-18.” As more young people report persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness, there’s been a push for more mental health interventions in schools. 

The governor’s plan suggests $175 million be spent to integrate mental health care in primary care offices, increase school-based telehealth, link schools to community resources and extend mental health education in schools. 

In an effort to provide teachers with more support, North Carolina recently expanded its Psychiatry Access Line to 130 public schools to offer mental health training and consultation. The state also recently awarded grants to five Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics, and the governor’s plan seeks to expand that community clinic model further to help people with more serious mental illness.

  • Behavioral health and justice systems — $150 million

Nationally, it’s estimated that more than 40 percent of people in jails have a mental illness, and more than 60 percent have a substance use disorder. Sometimes, people are arrested for a crime but are not mentally competent to stand trial. They must go through treatment to restore their mental capacity to take part in their court proceeding. Cooper’s plan includes more funds for this kind of treatment in local detention centers and communities. Until recently, the only facilities that could treat these patients were state-run psychiatric hospitals at the price tag of $1,400 per day, according to Kinsley. 

Kinsley added that justice-involved patients stay in state psychiatric hospitals on average twice as long as other patients, holding up beds and creating longer wait times for patients sitting in emergency departments. In December, Mecklenburg County launched the first pilot program with the state to do capacity restoration treatment in the county’s jail. Kinsley said his department approached four counties about starting this pilot, and only Mecklenburg agreed. Other counties are welcome to join, he added.

Cooper’s plan includes investments in programs that divert people with mental health and substance use issues from jail and into treatment and programs that help them live in the community again after they have been released. The plan also calls for “decision aids” and educational resources for judges who often direct people to either jail or a form of treatment. 

The governor’s plan has several policy recommendations too. He suggests that lawmakers review the state’s involuntary commitment laws to avoid unnecessary institutionalization, as many people go to the hospital willingly for help and end up under an involuntary commitment order, a costly level of treatment that temporarily takes away a patient’s ability to make their own health decisions. His plan recommends a “study of policy options, such as a Medicaid 1115 waiver, that support reentry health services for certain incarcerated individuals 90 days prior to release.”

  • Behavioral health crisis support — $200 million

“All too often, the front door to behavioral health care is our crisis system, because people don’t seek care or can’t access it until they reach a crisis point,” the governor’s report reads. 

The plan includes upgrades to the state’s 988 crisis lifeline to include offering telehealth visits and incorporating a “warmline” where peer support specialists — people with lived experience of mental illness — answer the phone. The governor’s policy recommendations include reducing access to lethal means for suicide and implementing safe firearm storage practices. 

The state recently partnered with health organizations to launch 15 mobile mental health clinics, and Cooper’s plan seeks to add even more to cover the many rural counties that still do not have one. The plan would add facility-based crisis and drop-in centers so people experiencing mental health distress can avoid going to the emergency room for an initial evaluation. The plan calls for investment in housing for people with serious mental illness, who often have nowhere to go after being discharged from a hospital.

The governor’s plan includes the creation of a statewide transportation service to drive mental health patients under an involuntary commitment order, or those seeking voluntary treatment, to a psychiatric hospital. Currently, mental health patients are transported by sheriff’s deputies — often in handcuffs — which patients and their families find traumatizing. Meanwhile, sheriffs have said they no longer want this role. 

  • Address foster care issues — $100 million

There have been multiple reports of children in foster care living in hospital emergency departments and child welfare offices. The governor’s report confirms that this is the case for more than 50 children each week, and Kinsley noted that some of these children have been moved up to 50 times. 

“North Carolina still has the lowest per child spending and child welfare among other states who have decentralized systems, and overall we are 36th in the nation —  at the bottom of funding per child,” Kinsley told the audience at the breakfast event in February. “You get what you pay for.”

Posted on

Criticized for their physical therapy, Lions invest in new director of player health

Criticized for their physical therapy, Lions invest in new director of player health

INDIANAPOLIS — Following surveying 1,300 players about their very own groups previous calendar year, the NFLPA has launched a report card for all 32 teams in categories ranging from remedy of households, food provider/nourishment, body weight place, energy coaches, education place, training staff, locker home and team journey. The Detroit Lions scored very in most groups and finished 15th all round, whilst players did give the group a D-minus for foods provider/nutrition (28th) and a D-in addition for the coaching space (24th).

Only 64{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f} of Lions gamers explained they considered the crew experienced sufficient actual physical therapists, the sixth-worst rate in the league.

“The two challenges that were being highlighted as spots for enhancement ended up initially, a sensation that the training place was understaffed, and second, that the foods provider was appreciably missing,” the NFLPA said of the Lions.

The study was carried out past 12 months. Now the Lions previously seem to be undertaking something about individuals problems, choosing Brett Fischer as their director of player wellness and functionality this offseason. Fischer arrived hugely regarded for his operate as a actual physical therapist with the Arizona Cardinals. He also ran his have facility for participant rehabilitation.

“He’s going to be a significant element of our medical performance and professional medical progression heading forward,” standard supervisor Brad Holmes explained this 7 days at the NFL incorporate. “He came really recommended. Just obtaining to know him by means of the course of action, we’re usually on the lookout to get improved in all locations of our business, and likely through this approach and acquiring to know Brett, I swiftly saw what all people was expressing about him. He’s a forward-thinker, he’s a collaborator, and he’s going to head our professional medical system, operating in conjunction with Mike Clark.

“We just want to get superior with our health care efficiency in general, but most importantly, just our player perfectly-being. I think Brett Fischer is likely to be a massive cog in that.”

The Lions have been amongst the most-injured groups in recent decades, such as struggling a spate of back and reduce-human body injuries last time. Defensive tackle Levi Onwuzurike and guards Halapoulivaati Vaitai and Tommy Kraemer didn’t enjoy at all although working with back again concerns, even though security Tracy Walker turned the third defender to be misplaced to an Achilles harm in the last two seasons.

“You simply cannot assist but at the very least look at (the again injuries) and say, ‘All proper, are we accomplishing one thing? Do we need to do a little something various? Is there something that we’re not doing ideal?’” head coach Dan Campbell stated past season. “We’re searching at every little thing, and there’s nothing that I can consider of suitable now that claims we did anything that we shouldn’t have been executing.”

In the end, the Lions feel to have identified some items they can do in a different way. In addition to beefing up the clinical workers, they’re laying state-of-the-art taking part in surfaces at Ford Field as very well as the exercise facility. Players have blamed people surfaces for the club’s superior harm price.

As for the team’s report card, players were being generally favourable in most other categories.

Procedure of households: B (t-12th)

Fat home: B-moreover (t-13th)

Strength coach: A-minus (t-17th)

Teaching workers: B-in addition (t-22nd)

Locker area: B (t-14th)

Team vacation: A (t-4th)

Posted on

Need to invest in health and nutrition to boost education

Need to invest in health and nutrition to boost education

Have to have to invest in well being and diet to increase education

(File/AFP)
Uncomplicated interventions in well being and diet go a extended way in marketing education and attendance at educational facilities (File/AFP)

A report by a few UN bodies — UNESCO, UNICEF and WHO — has warned that countries all-around the planet, notably in the creating-earth nations in Africa and South Asia, have to have to devote noticeably a lot more in school wellbeing and nourishment courses to boost their education and learning stages.

The report suggests that there is a direct connection concerning great gains in the quality of studying in educational facilities if the young children are not only nicely-fed but also wholesome, which delivers critical financial and social gains by setting up human funds. The report suggests that faculty feeding courses provide $9 in gain for every $1 invested, though investment decision in overall overall health of the baby at school delivers even higher gains, $21.5 for each $1 invested in psychological health, for instance.

Even modest, seemingly uncomplicated interventions in well being and nourishment go a very long way to advertising and marketing education and learning and attendance at educational facilities. For instance, faculty-dependent deworming and micronutrient supplementation courses lead to 2.5 a long time of further education, with a much more than 20 for each cent reduction in anaemia in adolescent girls. Provision of college meals qualified prospects to 9 per cent larger enrolment and 8 per cent greater attendance. Even offering no cost vision screening and glasses can see a 5 for every cent bigger chance of passing checks in looking at and arithmetic, or a 62 for every cent fall in absenteeism by applying malaria avoidance courses. Handwashing in faculties can see a fall of 61 for each cent in absenteeism in minimal-revenue nations.

Thus, a series of these modest, seemingly isolated interventions and investments can not only boost schooling but also go a lengthy way in shifting the international locations alongside the route to meet their commitments as component of the sustainable progress ambitions that have to be fulfilled by 2030.

However, even although there has been adequate consciousness about the will need to take a complete approach towards education and learning, health and fitness and diet, governments in most nations around the world, and more so in producing world nations in Africa and Asia, keep on to allocate substantially decreased budgets for these packages than what is wanted.

Not only are the nations around the world responsible of underinvesting in schooling, but also of even allocating a compact pittance for wellness and nutrition.

Ranvir S. Nayar

The need to make investments in the total progress of a boy or girl turned even extra evident throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, as the prolonged closures of educational institutions impacted practically each boy or girl with the most significant penalties for the socio-economically vulnerable children, predominantly those in the lousy international locations where by far more than 370 million schoolchildren lost obtain to faculty foods, frequently the only well balanced and healthy meal of the day for most of these children. The condition has been created even worse by the foods crisis and superior inflation that followed the pandemic, top to a major rise in baby poverty and malnutrition in lousy nations around the world all around the world.

Even while the exact extent of these crises is continue to emerging by means of various experiences, there have been suitable warnings issued by a lot of major world organizations and NGOs engaged in boy or girl progress close to the world about the pressing have to have for the governments to drastically boost investments in well being and diet, together with education. The want, definitely, is far larger in nations, generally the building and least created international locations, that have been below-investing in these sectors.

Not only are the countries guilty of underinvesting in training, but also of even allocating a compact pittance for well being and diet. At $210 billion collectively, the yearly finances of instruction for low- and lessen-middle-earnings international locations is plainly inadequate to permit each kid to get quality primary education. But even this sum appears to be like like royal extravagance when in contrast to the amounts invested in the well being of college-heading young children in these nations, which totals barely $2 billion.

The obstacle listed here is not at all a absence of recognition amongst the governments or plan makers, as pretty much every single region in the entire world has a plan to endorse university wellness and diet as an built-in system. The sole challenge is a really serious mismatch concerning the quantities of resources essential to cater to the children and what is being delivered in national budgets.

And even in countries the place university meals are remaining offered, in an too much to handle 89 per cent of these international locations, the policy intervention stopped at general public colleges, with non-public schools remaining to decide for themselves on provision of school foods. This has a critical impact on a massive chunk of faculty-going small children, as in numerous nations, together with substantial kinds like India, private schools account for anywhere involving 30-50 for every cent of all college small children.

While determining their once-a-year budgets, most governments in weak nations continue on to immediate their spending on huge-ticket objects this kind of as bridges, streets and rails, which are visible physically but whose impact on the modern society, in particular the youngsters, is somewhat negligible, when compared to financial commitment in the prolonged-phrase and over-all improvement of small children, as the influence of these packages results in being obvious years or even many years later.

But it is not just governments that are responsible of disregarding these critical investments in the long term of these societies. Global support organizations, wealthy international locations and of training course the non-public-sector corporations in the establishing environment, all have a job to engage in in making a society that is not just perfectly-educated but also healthier in human body and head. Only a collaborative and worldwide work can assistance to guarantee that every boy or girl is very well-fed, healthful and nicely-educated.

  • Ranvir S. Nayar is running editor of Media India Team.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this segment are their personal and do not essentially reflect Arab News’ issue of watch

Posted on

Is A Downturn The Best Time To Invest In Marketplaces And Platforms In Healthcare?

Is A Downturn The Best Time To Invest In Marketplaces And Platforms In Healthcare?

“Our goal is… modest: we simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful,” wrote Warren Buffett in a 1986 letter to shareholders about the twin contagions of fear and greed in the investment community.

More recently, the real-world Covid-19 contagion drove investment in digital health to record-breaking levels in 2021, roughly double the previous record. Experts gushed (in large part, correctly) about how a silver lining of the contagion was that it had done more to advance telehealth, virtual care and digital health writ large in 10 months than the previous 10 years.

Gravity is a powerful force, however, especially when combined with rising interest rates, continued war and threat of escalation in Ukraine, and fears of a recession. Accordingly, Rock Health recently reported that investment in digital health dropped a whopping 47{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f} in 2022.

A quickly emerging consensus has arrived among the early stage investment community, summed up well by the recent JP Morgan healthcare conference: focus on profitability, not growth.

The only problem with this perspective? It may well be the dead wrong advice for startups pursuing network effects-driven business models, which underpin four of the five most highly valued companies in the world.

For founders and investors focused on building marketplaces and platforms in digital health, 2023 may be the time to heed Buffett’s counsel: when everybody around seems fearful and focused on playing it safe, it just may be the right time to be audacious (or even a little greedy, using Buffett’s parlance).

Why Platforms and Marketplaces Are Different From (And Outperform) Most Technology Companies

Network effects are often misunderstood, but also fairly easily explained: they occur when the value of a product (or service) increases with the adoption and use of the product by others. There can be “same side” network effects (as in the case of Facebook), or “cross side” network effects (e.g., Uber) in which the presence of one side of users (riders) creates value for the other (drivers) and vice versa.

Both online marketplaces (e.g., Amazon) and multi-sided platforms (e.g., Plaid) take advantage of network effects. Network effects are a simple enough concept, but consider the implications: as more people use the product, more value is created for all, which can in turn attract new users and makes the product itself ‘stickier’ for existing users. As the user footprint itself grows, there are increasing opportunities for monetization. Just one example: from 2007 to 2021 while Facebook grew its user footprint an astonishing 50X (from 58M to 2.9B users), its revenue grew at an even more astonishing 732X (from $153M to $112B).

Consider research comparing some of the largest technology companies embracing network effects (marketplaces and platforms) with their equally large pure play technology peers. The data shows that platforms and marketplaces significantly outperform their peers

  • Grow revenue faster than their pure tech peers (25{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f} vs 10{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f})
  • Are more scalable, generating substantially higher revenue per employee than their pure tech peers ($891K vs $409K)
  • Achieve higher levels of profitability than their pure tech peers (22{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f} vs 16{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f})
  • Are accordingly valued more highly their pure tech peers (4.5X to 3.3X EV/Revenue)

If platforms and marketplaces are so powerful and so clearly outperform their ‘pure technology’ peers, why don’t all companies embrace network effects? There are of course many contributing reasons (including that platforms tend to fail at higher rates), but perhaps chief among them: platform thinking requires a different management paradigm and approach to value creation than traditional ‘pipeline’ business models.

The emerging wisdom for digital health – to focus on profitability – applies to one, less so to the other.

Why Is Now The Time To Invest In Platforms And Marketplaces?

Virtually every startup in healthcare winds up offering some type of discount, free offer, or other form of subsidy early on in their lifecycle. Long and painful sales cycles or the lack of proven outcomes are just two reasons why a startup may trade revenue for something in return: a referral customer, a testimonial, partnership to validate the ROI, etc.

The challenge for any early stage investor is to weigh the economic promise of a company against the massive weight of uncertainty and market inertia; demonstration of revenue and attractive unit economics is one way to do so.

For pipeline businesses, especially those in healthcare, this approach makes sense. Achieving product-market fit in any industry is hard work (and most venture backed companies will fail), and healthcare’s regulatory environment, complex financing and payment system increase the risks.

Just above we called attention to how mature marketplace and platform businesses outperform and are more capital efficient than their pure tech counterparts, it’s important to note that the inverse is also true: in the early stages, it takes substantially more effort and capital to start the ‘flywheel’ process, and both revenue and unit economics are a lagging indicator of business prospects.

This makes sense if one considers the nature of network effects: if the platform gains value with more adoption, then early on there is little value to early adopters and little incentive for prospects to adopt. And even less incentive to pay for the product if the intrinsic value is heavily driven by the presence of others.

In the early stages, it takes substantially more effort and capital for platform businesses to start the ‘flywheel’ process, and both revenue and unit economics are a lagging indicator of business prospects.

This is what constitutes the ‘Cold Start’ problem.

But less recognized that the ‘Cold Start’ problem, which focuses on adoption and value, is how founders and investors should think about the Cold Start from a capital and burn rate perspective. Investors in particular tend to invest in and may actively manage a portfolio of companies; they look for patterns both prior to and following investment, and most of these patterns are driven by pipeline thinking, which constitute the majority of dollars and deals in healthcare.

Hence the tension that early stage platform and marketplace founders may face: most investors will have an eye toward short term macro conditions and toward profitability, while founders may understand theirs is a longer term play and a seemingly high rate of cash burn may be entirely appropriate.

For those contrarian founders and investors who can align on vision, strategy and execution plan, however, now may be precisely the right time to invest in platforms and marketplaces in healthcare.

Why? For many reasons.

First, where competition exists, it is likely facing significant challenges. Belts are tightening, and capital is drying up. And, as described above, there is likely significant tension between management and investors around use of resources. The more conservative the approach, the less likely the long term strategy. Further, the current drop in funding means there is likely to be less competition for a period of time. Forward-thinking teams and investors will take advantage.

Second, forward-thinking investors will recognize that, while first mover advantage can frequently be overstated in importance, they can matter a great deal in winner-take-all (or winner-take-most markets). There is perhaps no greater contributing factor to creating ‘winner-take-all’ dynamics than network effects. Timing matters of course. If a platform can begin generating momentum to get the proverbial ‘flywheel’ turning before competitors, it has more than a substantial (and perhaps insurmountable) head start.

Third, aligned understanding of platform strategy between founders and investors can lead to deep structural advantages. Customers whose belts have tightened are likely to be very receptive to adopting technology that yields an immediate return with no upfront or costs in the near term.

Fourth, the longer growth cycles for marketplaces and platform businesses means that exits are likely to occur in a materially different macroeconomic environment.

We can also look to the past for examples. Uber was founded in March 2009, during the Great Recession. Likewise, Airbnb was founded in 2008. Amazon now is one of the biggest companies in the world, but survived in 2000 in large part because it raised significant capital just before the market crashed.

For forward-thinking investors, now may indeed be the right time to invest in marketplaces and platforms. Is there a reason to think about doing so in healthcare?

Why Marketplaces and Platforms in Healthcare?

Three macro trends suggest we’re at a unique period in time for investors in healthcare.

First, it’s hard to overstate the sea change that has occurred – and also the one that has not yet – as a result of 2009’s stimulus bill. Known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the bill contained massive subsidies to drive physician and hospital adoption and “meaningful use” of electronic health records.

The sea change that happened: EHR adoption shot up to >90{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f}, from under 10{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f} adoption.

The sea change that didn’t happen (yet): meaningful use and interoperability in a manner that would enable improved care coordination, population health management, and researcher accessibility to vast swaths of real world data.

Today, virtually every doctor in the U.S. now practices medicine and interacts with patients while working in an application on a laptop. It is no coincidence that levels of digital health have risen dramatically – and will likely do so again – over the past decade, as investors and entrepreneurs see the opportunity to leverage digitized processes and data, and to deliver on the sea change that hasn’t happened yet.

Second, it’s not news to suggest that healthcare is recession-proof. In fact, recent data suggests that demand for healthcare services actually increases during recessions. In addition, the record $29 billion invested in digital health in 2021 is still tiny compared with the $4T in healthcare spend (of which perhaps 25{08cd930984ace14b54ef017cfb82c397b10f0f7d5e03e6413ad93bb8e636217f} is wasteful), suggesting there remains enormous opportunity to improve healthcare quality and access while reducing costs.

Third, many of the biggest challenges in healthcare are those best addressed by marketplaces and platforms. Care coordination, provider-payer relationships, care navigation, information asymmetry, and price transparency are all examples of the types of challenges created by a complex, highly regulated and fragmented industry where quality is highly variable and trust between constituents is low.

Platforms and marketplaces create economic value by bringing different constituents / sides of users together and enabling exchange. To do so, they must identify where incentives do or can align, bring uniformity and standardization to transactions, and introduce or increase transparency in order to build trust. Doing so is a business imperative, and one that aligns the platforms’ interest with the broader societal interest in making healthcare more efficient, accessible, and higher quality for all.

Finally, while it’s important to note that healthcare is indeed different, that difference can be rewarding for founders and investors. The highly regulated nature of healthcare, fragmentation, highly educated and trained workforce, and importance of clinical workflow can all lead to greater barriers to entry and higher switching costs for customers. In other words, defensibility for companies and investors.

Six Steps For Founders and Investors To Take Now

What to do with all this information? Get started. Although there is no step-by-step guide for founders or investors interested in building or investing in marketplaces and platforms in healthcare, here are six steps that each can take:

  1. Focus on inefficient interactions that are massive problems: Jonathan Bush has said that healthcare is not a $4T market, but rather thousands of billion dollar markets. But it’s also true that many of the biggest problems involve interactions that involve two or more constituents. One easy place to look, for instance: provider-to-payer interactions. Whether it’s reimbursement, network contracting, utilization management, directory management, or hundreds of other transactions, today’s ‘system’ is rife with inefficiencies and lack of trust in terms of how providers and payers interact.
  2. Develop a thesis about how the world should work: Today’s system is still largely paper- or fax-based. And that’s when it’s not being handled over the phone. If there were a common, trusted platform to facilitate interactions, how would it work? Who would benefit? Why would different constituents use it? Who would pay for it?
  3. First things first – build an atomic network: one of the most important things to remember is that reality will differ from your vision in profound ways. Better to figure those things out, and the difference between what works and what doesn’t, early on when the network is smaller, mistakes are less costly. Andrew Chen recommends building an ‘atomic network’, which is the minimum size for a network to survive on its own (See Musk, Elon, re importance of this lesson).
  4. Invest in understanding platform strategy: As described above, building a platform or marketplace requires a different mindset from building a pipeline business. There’s too little platform strategy expertise and experience in healthcare, but there are resources and good books out there to get started. It’s worthwhile to understand the nuances, since not all network effects are equal.
  5. Align on expectations: Among the most important lessons for both founders and investors is for them both to understand what they’re getting into, what it’s going to take to get there, why it’s worth the effort, and what the process is likely going to look like.
  6. Right metrics: The recognition that platforms build value in a different trajectory and have a different revenue profile than ‘pure technology’ pipeline companies should not be taken to mean that money should be invested willy-nilly. If the payout is larger but longer, it’s even more critical for both sides (management and investor) to hold each other accountable for progress. Developing the right metrics to track, and understanding which ones are most important during which stage of growth, is critical.

Be Mindful of Buffett When Others Are Fearful

Warren Buffett has had a decent streak of success since his 1986 letter to shareholders. This, of course, is putting it mildly.

This author doesn’t believe in advocating for greed (and certainly not greed alone), but in recognizing the attractive and long term investment opportunities that remain right in front of us while most are taking the seemingly safer and certainly more well-traveled path.

Posted on

Medical equipment company to invest $71 to build facility in Burlington

Medical equipment company to invest to build facility in Burlington
Medical equipment company to invest to build facility in Burlington

The City of Burlington has declared a California-centered professional medical devices production organization designs to make investments $71 million in building its initial East Coast facility in the metropolis.  

Steri-Tek, an electron beam and x-ray sterilization organization, introduced this week that the firm ideas to assemble a 150,000 sq.-foot facility on a 13-acre web-site at 1404 Anthony Highway. 

Want to know a lot more about what is going on in Burlington? Help local journalism, subscribe to The Burlington Instances-Information.

“The Metropolis of Burlington is happy to be the East Coastline home of Steri-Tek, and we are energized for the foreseeable future of the existence sciences industrial park bordering this campus.  It took teamwork and collaboration concerning several governmental agencies to safe this challenge and we are appreciative of all people concerned,” reported Burlington Mayor Jim Butler.